On August 5th 2022, this tweet appeared on my timeline:
https://twitter.com/jaym217/status/1555571144790507521?s=20&t=ok7yEZ24QHq9XrNO2rI4og
The tweet asserts that the LEAPs are expensive or “priced for perfection”. The next part of the sentence is shaky if you take it literally — “if you can hedge the upside blowout risk”. You “can” sell the straddle for about $50 whether or not you can hedge the upside, but the author is prudently demonstrating where the risk resides. I give a total hall pass to the writing as my own tweets are often thrown together while standing in line at Trader Joe’s.
Allow me to re-word the tweet without worrying about character limits and without feeling rushed.
“Optically, the CVNA LEAP straddle is expensive because it’s trading for the same premium as the strike price. I can’t get burned on the downside so my only concern is the unbounded upside of the call option I’m short, so if I can truncate the potential loss there, this straddle is a good candidate to sell”
The original poster exhibits a solid understanding of options. But…markets are hard. They don’t leave free or near-free money laying around. It turns out, with 5 months of hindsight, this is a good case study in the limits of optically attractive trades.
[In What The Widowmaker Can Teach Us About Trade Prospecting And Fool’s Gold I dissect another optically attractive trade that is really just fool's gold.]
By dissecting what has happened we can learn about how to think of options “dynamically”.
We’ll use a rhetorical approach to this lesson to make it more interactive. Think about your answers before toggling open the answer or discussion.
On August 5, 2022 CVNA closed at $46.98
<aside> ✔️ Assumptions